<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collection Development: Weeding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.athenasbanquet.net/2009/07/collection-development-weeding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.athenasbanquet.net/2009/07/collection-development-weeding</link>
	<description>Devouring words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:59:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.athenasbanquet.net/2009/07/collection-development-weeding/comment-page-1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.athenasbanquet.net/?p=19#comment-52</guid>
		<description>In many cases, they were pretty out of date but in decent condition.  Still, we only have a limited amount of shelf space and if the content covered was available in a newer book then we&#039;d tend to keep that one.

If it was old but we truly didn&#039;t have anything covering that material (and the material was in-demand), we&#039;d absolutely keep an older book, but that&#039;s a pretty rare situation.

I did pull a book from 1965 on African instruments.  We didn&#039;t have anything newer or better and it wasn&#039;t in terrible condition, but I &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; can&#039;t justify keeping a book that includes the phrase &quot;a musical people&quot; in the subtitle on the shelves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many cases, they were pretty out of date but in decent condition.  Still, we only have a limited amount of shelf space and if the content covered was available in a newer book then we&#8217;d tend to keep that one.</p>
<p>If it was old but we truly didn&#8217;t have anything covering that material (and the material was in-demand), we&#8217;d absolutely keep an older book, but that&#8217;s a pretty rare situation.</p>
<p>I did pull a book from 1965 on African instruments.  We didn&#8217;t have anything newer or better and it wasn&#8217;t in terrible condition, but I <i>really</i> can&#8217;t justify keeping a book that includes the phrase &#8220;a musical people&#8221; in the subtitle on the shelves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tejolote</title>
		<link>http://www.athenasbanquet.net/2009/07/collection-development-weeding/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>tejolote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.athenasbanquet.net/?p=19#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Books that were published or acquired before I was born were definitely on the chopping block (and there were a few of these…)

Were they all in such terrible condition or so horribly out of date?

“Circ it til it’s dead” 

What a lovely heroic?  Quixotic? motto.  Neither word is quite right, but it&#039;s a lovely image all the same.

I have a hard enough time thinning my own collection periodically, I can&#039;t imagine the Herculean task of thinning a library collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Books that were published or acquired before I was born were definitely on the chopping block (and there were a few of these…)</p>
<p>Were they all in such terrible condition or so horribly out of date?</p>
<p>“Circ it til it’s dead” </p>
<p>What a lovely heroic?  Quixotic? motto.  Neither word is quite right, but it&#8217;s a lovely image all the same.</p>
<p>I have a hard enough time thinning my own collection periodically, I can&#8217;t imagine the Herculean task of thinning a library collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
